Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, Public Defender Connor Herrold, Louis White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Adams et al
as 4:2023cv04006
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Jail Administrator Alice Miller, Connie Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2022cv04117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, James Ross, James Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Ross et al
as 4:2020cv04081
Defendant:
Carl Jensen, Tim Garner, Gina Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lester Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Taber et al
as 6:2020cv06081
Defendant:
Sergeant Keith Prince, Troy Norton, Donnie D Taber and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lomant Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Davenport et al
as 4:2020cv04026
Defendant:
Parole Officer Vincent Gamble, Parole Officer Jesse Davis, Parole Officer Heath James Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Brady A. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv02126
Defendant:
Mercdes Anderson, Sean McNevin and Shane Davis
Plaintiff:
Heath Lunsford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatlin v. Goodman
as 3:2019cv03052
Defendant:
Jared Pointer, Wade, Jason Day and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Joe Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrow v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 6:2019cv06033
Defendant:
Omega Program, M Chapman, Correct Care Solution and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Heath Burrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Singleton et al
as 4:2019cv04021
Defendant:
Lieutenant Heath Ross, Sheriff James Singleton, John Doe Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Junior Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
