Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Hanrahan v. AMMO Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hanrahan
Defendant:
AMMO Incorporated, Fred Wagenhals and Heather Wagenhals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stein v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynn Stein
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cassaday v. Phoenix Body Works Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02055
Plaintiff:
Heather Cassaday
Defendant:
Phoenix Body Works Incorporated, Gregory May and Corinne May
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Young v. Lets Bet AZ Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08258
Plaintiff:
Heather Young
Defendant:
Lets Bet AZ Incorporated, Denver Sports Betting LLC and Ryan Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vega v. Antillon et al
as 4:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
Reyes Vega
Defendant:
Jesse Antillon, Heather Nef, Sabrina Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jefferson v. Shah et al
as 4:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr.
Defendant:
Manish Mansukhlal Shah, Heather Nicola, Nicholas Thibault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trent v. Wisehart et al
as 3:2021cv08220
Plaintiff:
Max Randall Trent
Defendant:
Michael Wisehart, Heather D Noble and Scott M Lekan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cullens et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carlos Londray Cullens and Al-Huda School Tucson
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Arizona Department of Economic Security, Tucson Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
