Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
INZAR v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv05547
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE INZAR
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY LANIGAN, PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPOVERDE v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2016cv03305
Plaintiff:
DIEGO CAMPOVERDE
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, PATRICK A. NOGAN, HELEN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
STALLINGS v. CRUZ et al
as 2:2015cv07488
Plaintiff:
SHIRIN NANETTE STALLINGS
Defendant:
MARY CRUZ, MARIA MERCADO, JOSEPH SOCOLOF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golda Harris v. Valerie Arthur, et al
as 15-2746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VALERIE ARTHUR, HELEN ADAMS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
AARON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05819
Plaintiff:
VICKIE AARON , HELEN ADAMS , CAROLYN ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ARTHUR et al
as 3:2013cv03806
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant:
VALERIE ARTHUR, HELEN ADAMS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAND v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv02137
Plaintiff:
TAMMI RAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, EDNA MAHAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FOR WOMEN , GEORGE W. HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADAMS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68804
Plaintiff:
NICK ADAMS and HELEN ADAMS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and W.R. GRACE & COMPANY - CONN.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
