Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Koon v. Rushton
as 07-7462
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON
Respondent - Appellee:
COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Stewart v. Ozmint
as 07-7476
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD L. STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden, Lee Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Parkel et al v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 4:2007cv03009
Plaintiff:
Judith A Parkel, Blake H Moore and Kingstree Surgical Associates LLC
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Henry Dargan McMaster, Kim Adylette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. McMaster et al
as 3:2007cv02929
Plaintiff:
Willie James Owens
Defendant:
Henry Dargan McMaster, William M Catoe, C Weston Houck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Workman v. McMaster
as 9:2007cv02190
Petitioner:
Jerome Workman
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Savitz et al
as 3:2007cv01703
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Davis
Defendant:
Joseph L Savitz, III, Henry Dargan McMaster, Robert Arial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ellerby v. McMaster
as 3:2007cv01176
Petitioner:
Leslie Ellerby
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bustos v. White
as 07-6598
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOSE BUSTOS
Respondent - Appellant:
WILLIAM WHITE, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina
Williams v. Berkeley County Summary Courts
as 9:2007cv00634
Petitioner:
Charles E Williams
Respondent:
Berkeley County Summary Courts and Henry Dargan McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
