Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Tiffany Banks, et al v. Housing Authority of DeKalb Co, et al
as 14-13777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIFFANY BANKS, TAMMY BOSS, HENRY DIXON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF DEKALB COUNTY and EUGENE WALKER, in his official capacity as its Executive Director
Banks et al v. The Housing Authority of DeKalb County et al
as 1:2014cv02593
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Banks, Tammy Boss, Henry Dixon and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Natalie Sanders
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of DeKalb County and Eugene Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Dixon v. Brookshire Brothers Inc
as 2:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Defendant:
Brookshire Brothers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. Housing Authority of DeKalb County et al
as 1:2014cv01281
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Banks , Tammy Boss , Henry Dixon and others
Defendant:
Housing Authority of DeKalb County and Eugene Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Dixon v. People of the State of California
as 2:2014cv00631
Petitioner:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Hill
as 2:2013cv01409
Petitioner:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Hill
as 1:2013cv01081
Petitioner:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarence Dixon v. James Yate
as 11-16075
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE HENRY DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES
Dixon v. California Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv01949
Plaintiff:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. California Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv03009
Plaintiff:
Clarence Henry Dixon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
