Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Crespo v. Carvajal
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRESPO, ANTHONY PODIAS, PEDRO ESPADA, JR. and others
Intervenor:
CHENSHIN CHAN and DAVID NAGY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Northeast Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN HERMAN QUAY, III, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn and others
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
B. Thompson, Herman Quay, III and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Quay, III
as 1:2020cv01413
Petitioner:
Julio Hernandez Lopez
Respondent:
Herman Quay, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarron v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01903
Defendant:
Brian Gerson, Deborah Schult, Rame Awd and others
Plaintiff:
Frank McCarron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Crespo et al v. Inch et al
as 1:2017cv06329
Defendant:
Kimberly Ask-Carlson, Michael Carvajal, Wayne Decker and others
Plaintiff:
David Crespo, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Sclafani v. Quay
as 2:2016cv06783
Respondent:
Herman Quay, III
Petitioner:
Gregory Sclafani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Podius et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv06121
Plaintiff:
William Alvarado, Sandy Batista, Errol Campbell and others
Defendant:
Counselor Bennett, Unit Manager J. Childress, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Quay
as 3:2015cv01594
Plaintiff:
Asmar Nafis Newsome
Defendant:
Herman Quay, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Quay
as 3:2014cv01517
Petitioner:
Jose Colon
Respondent:
Herman Quay, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
