Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Torres Hernandez v. Lloyd et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Torres Hernandez
Defendant:
James Abraham LLoyd, Juan Diaz, Troy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights (False Arrest)
Allen v. Tunecore et al
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Marcus M. Allen
Defendant:
Tunecore, Dennis Ladegaillerie, Distro Kid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Martinez v. MH Investments, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
German Martinez
Defendant:
MH Investments, Inc. doing business as Squisito Pizza & Pasta and Martin Zarate Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Escobar Hernandez
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Noom, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
MARILYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
NOOM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hernandez v. Bloomingdale's Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARILYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
BLOOMINGDALES INC., Bloomingdale's Inc., BLOOMINGDALES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
