Cases 41 - 50 of 8,968
Hernandez v. US Attorney General
as 2:2024cv11141
Plaintiff:
Phyllis L. Hernandez
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Hernandez-De Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2731
Petitioner:
GLADIS ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ-DE CORNEJO, EMELY PAOLA CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ and LIAN DANIEL CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez Hernandez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2734
Plaintiff:
JESUS ANTONIO PEREZ HERNANDEZ and JUAN CARLOS VAZQUEZ AVILA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Monjarrez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner:
BELINDA ARACELY MONJARREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson v. Ocasio-Montanez, et al
as 24-1423
Petitioner:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Respondent:
LUIS OCASIO-MONTANEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20758
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
US v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-1398
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL L. MORALES-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Angel, a/k/a Chinese Checker
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. WNEK et al
as 2:2024cv05659
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
STANLEY WNEK, GUSTAVO A. PALACIOS and ESPINDOLA-HERNANDEZ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
