Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Seiverd et al v. Arizona Elected Official Coup G.R.U. et al
as 3:2021cv08152
Defendant:
Douglas Anthony Ducey, One America News Network, CyTech Services and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Friedrich Seiverd and Weavel Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Herring v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02877
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marie Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vang et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv03870
Plaintiff:
Vee Vang, Chee Vang, Xeng Thao and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Herring v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
Julie Herring
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acker v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03149
Plaintiff:
Christina Acker
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Mark Herring, Brian Frosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herring v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02809
Plaintiff:
Britt Herring
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02410
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Herring
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Request for Order Re Testimony in the Case of Cameco Corporation
as 4:2016mc00008
Respondent:
Her Majesty The Queen
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Herring v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
Dustin Wayne Herring
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herring v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2015cv00911
Plaintiff:
Dustin Wayne Herring
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
