Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Crisantos v. Moubarek et al
as 1:2019cv02932
Defendant:
Warden J. R. Bell, Shobe, Felix and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Crisantos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Adams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03420
Defendant:
S. Sheetz, Solomon Hejirika, A. Edmonds and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harding v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv02971
Defendant:
Mary Ann Saar, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Sexual Offender Advisory Board and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harding v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv02386
Defendant:
Mary Ann Saar, Anne Arundel County, Maryland, Gregg L. Hershberger and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gambino v. Hershberger et al
as 8:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
David A. Gambino
Defendant:
Frank Hershberger, Shane Sheetz, Kristi Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Bruman Stalin Alvarez
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, David Blumberd, Greeg L. Hershberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gambino v. Hershberger et al
as 8:2016cv03806
Plaintiff:
David A Gambino
Defendant:
Frank Hershberger, Shane Sheetz, Eirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bushrod v. Stewart et al
as 8:2016cv01879
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Bushrod
Defendant:
Timothy Stewart , Mohammed Moubarek , McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
