Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fuqua v. Hess et al
as 3:2016cv01510
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fuqua
Defendant:
R. Marshall Hess, Sheffield Police Department and City of Sheffield, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
John Hess , M Gavin Grant , James McGee and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neal v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv02312
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
James P Smith , Robert V Woods, Jr, Nicole L Schrorer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Sanford et al
as 3:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
Jantzen O Jackson
Defendant:
Ian Sanford, Greg Ray, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. Mark Henry
as 1:2012cv00664
Petitioner:
Raymond Floyd Hess
Respondent:
Mark Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pouncey v. Summerlin et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Steven Young Pouncey
Defendant:
Chris Summerlin , Susie Peters , Tom Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
