Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hess v. USA
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Stephanie Graziano Hess
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Monahan v. Cutler et al
as 7:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Christopher Monahan
Defendant:
Sheriff Alan W. Cutler, Phillip Broughton, Isaiah Crosson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Partridge v. Roxboro Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv00561
Defendant:
David L. Hess and Roxboro Police Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Partridge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephans v. Jackson County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Stephans
Defendant:
Brian Welmon, Jackson County Courthouse, James Clawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Jones et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2018cv00509
Plaintiff:
Casey L. Jones and Todd M. Hess
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff's Office, John Julian Aldridge, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARY HESS STUDIOS v. JG MOTORSPORTS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Defendant:
JG MOTORSPORTS, INC., HENDRICK MOTORSPORTS, LLC and JEFF GORDON, INC.
Plaintiff:
GARY HESS STUDIOS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GWALTNEY v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GWALTNEY
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY and CHRIS HESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. Hess et al
as 5:2016ct03068
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Robinson
Defendant:
Mr. Hess, George T. Solomon and Jeff Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESS v. CBS CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL HESS
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, FISHER-KLOSTERMAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
