Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff: DANIEL COCHRAN
Defendant: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. and others
Thompkins v. DXC Technology Company et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Defendant: Enterprise Services Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan, DXC Technology Company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Disability Plan, A Component Plan Under The Hewlett Packard Company Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan and others
Plaintiff: Roschell Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lovas v. DXC Technology Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff: Coleen Lovas
Defendant: DXC Technology Company, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01235
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Enterprise Services, LLC, Perspecta Enterprise Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant: Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant: Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner: Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: David Nichols
Nominal Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff: State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Caccavale et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00974
Plaintiff: Tony Caccavale and Anthony Mangelli
Defendant: Unisys Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Co. and Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center LLC et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02139
Defendant: Wolverine Worldwide Flexible Spending Account Plan, Monrovia Nursery Company Employee Benefit Plan, Future Electronics Corp. and others
Plaintiff: West Hills Surgery Center LLC, San Joaquin Valley Surgery Center LLC, Palmdale Surgery Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff: Bryant Fonseca
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company , HP Enterprise Services, LLC , HP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WHITE v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00491
Plaintiff: MATTHEW J WHITE
Defendant: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY , HP INC and HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson-Long v. Hewlett Packard Company Disability Plan et al
as 2:2017cv00233
Plaintiff: Marlene Thompson-Long
Defendant: Hewlett Packard Company Disability Plan and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?