Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Hicks v. Advocate Health, LLC
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Hicks
Defendant:
Advocate Health, LLC doing business as Advocate Health Advisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
JACOBY JAMES v. HICKS et al
as 2:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
DURON JACOBY JAMES
Defendant:
NATASHA HICKS, TRANSUNION, EXPERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Trump
as 1:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Hicks
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Supreme Court
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Hicks
Defendant:
Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARKSDALE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
ETIENNE BARKSDALE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY IRWIN and OFFICER J. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KLINGENSMITH v. HICKS
as 2:2023cv01213
Petitioner:
EDWARD R. KLINGENSMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Vincent Franklin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman and L. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zayas-Cintron v. Hicks, et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Luis Guil Zayas-Cintron
Defendant:
C.O. Hicks, Ms. Goss, C.O. Fieni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
