Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawgs & Dingoes, LLC v. The City of Pooler et al
as 4:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dawgs & Dingoes, LLC
Defendant:
The City of Pooler, Rebecca Benton, Stevie Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Washington v. Carr et al
as 4:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Chris M. Carr, Timothy Ward, Melanie Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. The City of Savannah, Georgia et al
as 4:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Janet K. Higgins
Defendant:
The City of Savannah, Georgia , Eddie Deloach , Van R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pyburn v. Dole et al
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Larry Pyburn
Defendant:
Sheri Dole, Barbra Retzer, Stephen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins et al v. Futch et al
as 2:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Angel Higgins, Kanecka Higgins and Calvin Butts
Defendant:
Carla Futch and Greg Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dana M. Higgins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Paul et al
as 6:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ian Harris
Defendant:
John Paul, Lisa Warnock, Bree Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Paul et al
as 6:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ian Harris
Defendant:
John Paul, Bree Higgins, Tamara Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logue v. Chatham County Detention Center, et al
as 4:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Clarence Redmond Logue, Jr.
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Prison Health Services, et al and Melanie Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
