Cases 1 - 10 of 61
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Martin Huerta v. Highmark, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01497
Plaintiff:
Martin Huerta
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as Highmark Blue Shield and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Long Island Neurosurgical Associates, P.C. v. Highmark Blue Shield
as 2:2021cv05879
Plaintiff:
Long Island Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
Highmark Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Specialists Hospital Shreveport L L C v. Harper
as 5:2021cv01748
Not Classified By Court:
Highmark Western and Northeastern New York
Plaintiff:
Specialists Hospital Shreveport L L C
3Rd Party Defendant:
Highmark Blue Shield doing business as BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York, Highmark Western & Northeastern New York formerly known as Healthnow New York Inc doing business as BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York, Healthnow New York Inc doing business as BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York and others
Defendant:
Joey L Harper, Joey Harper and Joey Lynn Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al v. Unity Outpatient Surgery Center Inc et al
as 8:2005cv00230
Defendant:
Tam Vu Pham, Thu Ngoc Pham, Unity Outpatient Surgery Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan and others
Petitioner:
Parvin Ataby and Sonia Hanson
Counter Defendant:
Empire HealthChoice Assurance Inc, Excellus Health Plan Inc and Highmark Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GILSRUD et al v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2020cv00659
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Plaintiff:
KAREN GILSRUD and TIMOTHY GILSRUD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
