Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kotevski v. Bush et al
as 2:2025cv02212
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski and Miki Kotevski
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Rodman Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Espinoza v. Clinton et al
as 1:2023cv12606
Plaintiff:
Jose David Espinoza
Defendant:
Hillary Rodman Clinton, William G. Young, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNBULL v. BIDEN et al
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A TURNBULL
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackers v. Brazile et al
as 1:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ackers
Defendant:
Donna Brazile, Cable News Network, Hillary Rodman Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Milbourn v. Clinton
as 3:2016cv00541
Defendant:
Hillary Rodman Clinton
Plaintiff:
Richard Milbourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Jing v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv06084
Defendant:
Hillary Rodman Clinton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Plaintiff:
Luo Jing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.