Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Offley v. Fashion Nova, LLC
as 1:2022cv10603
Plaintiff:
Amanda Offley, Jamie Dumelle, Lucy Massa and others
Defendant:
Fashion Nova, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Murray v. State Warden et al
as 1:2019cv12179
Petitioner:
James Murray and James Hines
Respondent:
Commowealth of Massachusetts and State Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
R.I. Seekonk Holdings, LLC. et al v. Hines
as 1:2019cv10230
Plaintiff:
R.I. Seekonk Holdings, LLC., Charles H. Tapalian and H Charles Tapalian, Sr.
Defendant:
Michelle A. Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reade v. Gants et al
as 1:2018cv12514
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Rufo, Barbara A. Lenk, Assistant Clerk John Dale and others
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merchia v. Virginia Board of Medicine
as 1:2018cv11136
Plaintiff:
Pankaj Merchia
Defendant:
Virginia Board of Medicine, Virginia Department of Health Professionals, William L. Harp, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2017cv12144
Plaintiff:
Laura Hines
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines MIP Cambridgepark Drive LLC v. Atlantis Comfort Systems Corporation
as 1:2017cv11908
Plaintiff:
Hines MIP Cambridgepark Drive LLC
Defendant:
Atlantis Comfort Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv40042
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Hines
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Daniel Hervey, Trevis Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
