Cases 1 - 10 of 18
PATEL v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2022cv02921
Petitioner:
HITEN A. PATEL
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS) Barasa Hiten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Barasa Hiten
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hiten Patel v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01349
Defendant:
James R. Henderson, Audrey A. McNiff, Eileen P. Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Hiten Patel
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. MANTIFF, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv14962
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant:
MANTIFF, INC., HITEN BHATT and Jignesh Gandhi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Dos Bowies LP et al v. Ackerman et al
as 1:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walter, Jason Morris, Benjamin Phillips and others
Defendant:
James A. Seijas, Michael W Ackerman and Quan Tran
United States of America v. Laxman Patel et al
as 8:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Laxman Patel, Hiten Patel, Jashu Patel and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
HKJM, Inc. et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01523
Plaintiff:
Hiten Adhvaryu and HKJM, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and LRJ Automotive, LLC
Laxman Patel et al v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv00238
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Anita Patel, Hiten Patel, Jashu Patel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv05375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
