Cases 1 - 10 of 33
United States v. Hobbs
as 23-5113
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HUNTER ISAIAH HOBBS
Barela v. The City of Hobbs, et al
as 23-2119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALBERT BARELA, by his next friend, Cyndi Barela
Defendant / Appellant:
THE CITY OF HOBBS, JOHN JOSEPH ORTOLANO, BRANDON MARINOVICH and others
Barela v. City of Hobbs, et al
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT BARELA, by his next friend, Cyndi Barela
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF HOBBS, JOHN JOSEPH ORTOLANO, BRANDON MARINOVICH and others
Shorter v. Carter, et al
as 23-2096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA MICHELLE SHORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON CARTER, CITY OF HOBBS and HOBBS MUNICIPAL COURT
Turlington v. Connor, et al
as 22-5001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN HARDEE TURLINGTON, II
Defendant / Appellee:
WINSTON H. CONNOR, II, STOCKWELL & CONNOR, PLLC, DELAWARE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA and others
Evans v. Ortiz, et al
as 21-2138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FORREST EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALICIA ORTIZ, MARTA FLORES, Public Service Representative, MARGARET WILLIAMS and others
Trujillo v. City of Hobbs, et al
as 20-2013
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF HOBBS and OFFICER ROYAL HOPPER, a Hobbs Police Department officer, sued in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATHANIEL TRUJILLO
Ward, et al v. City of Hobbs, et al
as 19-2137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA TODD, DENNIS HARGROVE and OCTAVIA WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY D. BRACKEEN, a Hobbs Police Department Officer, CITY OF HOBBS, ZAKARIAH T. DALE, a Hobbs Police Department Officer and others
Hobbs v. Allbaugh
as 17-5019
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM TAYLOR HOBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, Director
Hobbs v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary, et al
as 16-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. HOBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY, WAYNE BRACKENSEIK, AKA Wayne Brackensack, TERRY CRENSHAW, OSP Warden Assistant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
