Cases 11 - 20 of 103
HOLMES v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY/ECHO CLINIC
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HOLMES, JR.
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY/ECHO CLINIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Denette Holmes
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Edward E Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CURRY v. SCHILLING et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
RACHAEL SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, J. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HOLMES
Defendant:
ALLEN, ENDOY, MONICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
JACKLYN HOLMES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
HOLMES v. GTL
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
GTL, THE STATE OF INDIANA and THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. HANLON
as 1:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
JAMES PATRICK HANLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOATMAN, HOLMES, MORRIS, SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOATMAN, MARQUES HOLMES, DAVID MORRIS and others
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DR. DAUSS, DENNIS REGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. EMKES
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
CYNTHIA SUE EMKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
