Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 273
Holmes v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2021cv00722
Plaintiff: Donnetta Holmes
Defendant: MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES, JR. v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02523
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff: HERBERT F. HOLMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01386
Plaintiff: ROBERT HOLMES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv04794
Defendant: KARA MARIE SIDONE, WARDEN: ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff: HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04226
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff: DAVID DEMETREIUS HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03231
Defendant: DAVID WRIGHT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff: KEITH HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. GARMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv02854
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: DUANE MARCEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2019cv20197
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01349
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?