Other Statutes Cases
Boykin v. National Association of Realtors et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff: Angela Boykin
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, UMRO Realty Corp. d/b/a The Agency, Chase International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Masiello v. Arizona Association of Realtors et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Joseph Masiello
Defendant: Arizona Association of Realtors, Phoenix Board of Realtors Incorporated doing business as Phoenix Association of Realtors, Scottsdale Area Association of Realtors and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff: Daniel Umpa
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as MOW/4:23-CV-00945
Plaintiff: Umpa and Daniel Umpa
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. The National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2023cv05392
Plaintiff: Janet Phillips, Joseph Hunt, Edith Anne Hunt and others
Defendant: The National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., HSF Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MGMT RESIDENTIAL, LLC et al v. REEVES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03966
Plaintiff: MGMT Residential, LLC, 4539 Mitchell Holdings LLC, 6778-84 Ridge Holdings LLC and others
Defendant: Dayanna Reeves, Reyo Realty Group LLC d/b/a HomeSmart Realty Advisors and REYO REALTY GROUP, LLC doing business as HOMESMART REALTY ADVISORS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?