Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pierson v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Morgan Pierson
Defendant:
HOMETEAM PEST DEFENSE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Griffith, Jr. v. Hometeam Pest Defense Inc
as 2:2021cv03842
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Griffith, Jr.
Defendant:
Hometeam Pest Defense Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tejada v. Staff Pro Workforce, LLC
as 8:2021cv01130
Plaintiff:
Audi Tejada
Defendant:
Staff Pro Workforce, LLC and Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Torres v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
as 8:2020cv02648
Defendant:
Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia v. Rollins Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02991
Plaintiff:
Marisol Garcia
Defendant:
Rollins Inc. and HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc. fka Rollins HT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruner v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bruner
Defendant:
Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Garnica, et al v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc., et al
as 17-80020
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS GARNICA, an individual; on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated consumers and CORA POTTER
Defendant - Respondent:
HOMETEAM PEST DEFENSE, INC., a Delaware corporation and ROLLINS, INC.
Garnica v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05242
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garnica
Defendant:
Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Garnica v. Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05243
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Garnica
Defendant:
Hometeam Pest Defense, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
