Cases 41 - 50 of 199
Axtell v. Palomo et al
as 1:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Austyn Onstott, V. Harrel, M. Deleon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Axtell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2020cv02590
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Plaintiff:
Andrea M. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Vanluven-Malloy v. Correctional Medical Group Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03198
Defendant:
Jamie (I) Miller, Tammy Garrett, Shauri Kron and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Vanluven-Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matamoros v. Horton et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Petitioner:
Paul John Matamoros
Respondent:
Vincent Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carver v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al
as 6:2020cv00300
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Carver
Defendant:
Hailey Horton, Cherokee County Detention Center, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Horton, et al
as 20-2110
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero et al
as 1:2020cv00612
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Geo Group Inc., Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Vencent Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urioste v. Horton et al
as 1:2020cv00571
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Ronald Peters, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elias M Urioste
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Franklin v. Horton et al
as 1:2020cv00576
Respondent:
Vincent Horton and Hector Balderas
Petitioner:
Bryce Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
