Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Starkey v. Horton et al
as 3:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
Wayne Leonard Starkey
Defendant:
K. Horton and K. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Hill v. Commission on Judicial Perform, et al
as 16-56659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY LEE HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, Judge's Supervisiors State of California, official capacity, JUDGE JAMES R. BRANDLIN, official capacity, JUDGE STEVEN VON SICKLEN, official capacity and others
Horton v. Ducart et al
as 3:2016cv06411
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Horton
Defendant:
C.E. Ducart, D. Bradbury, M. Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Lee Hill v. Commission on Judicial Performance, CA et al
as 2:2016cv07622
Defendant:
Judge James R Brandlin, Commission on Judicial Performance, CA, Attorney Davis G. Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Hill
Horton v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horton
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Jacobs and Unknown Agnew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2016cv03156
Petitioner:
Daniel Horton
Respondent:
Anne Jacobs and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pascua v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv01738
Defendant:
Brian Connett, Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Bridget Pascua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Horton et al
as 2:2016cv01175
Defendant:
Jo Gentry, Tanya Hill, Sherrie Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almy v. Adams
as 3:2016cv00231
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Dr. Aranas, R. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
