Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Houdek v. Caseys Marketing Company
as 2:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
Robin Houdek
Defendant:
Caseys Marketing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HOUDEK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24129
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOUDEK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUDEK v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22613
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOUDEK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houdek v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02605
Plaintiff:
Chicago Houdek
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, North Dakota Dept. of Corrections, Randy McGoningal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Dept. of Corrections, Stephanie Keuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Morse et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Doug Morse, Captain Ebach, Shannon Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Jana Nelson, Deb Houdek, M. Hundley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houdek et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00688
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ed Houdek and Robin Houdek
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raphiel v. CVC of St. Tammany Parish
as 22-30127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Decalvin Raphiel and Gigi Raphiel
Defendant / Appellee:
CVC of St. Tammany Parish, Incorporated, Kevin J. Cullum, Jeremie Papin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
