Cases 21 - 30 of 255
Kowalski v. Houser et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Jared Kowalski
Respondent:
Earl Houser and Alaska Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carinio v. Houser
as 3:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Carinio Ernesto and Ernesto Carinio
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Dunleavy et al
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dionte T. Webb
Defendant:
Mike Dunleavy, Nancy Dahlstrom, Arlando Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Houser
as 4:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Stanely E. Smith
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Webb v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-36008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON, Washington State Attorney General, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN GESE
Houser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Brandi M. Houser
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hampton v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
Tyrone Hampton
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houser et al v. Powerdot, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01689
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Houser and Neurobridge LLC
Defendant:
Powerdot, Inc. and Therabody, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davison v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
Dennis L Davison
Defendant:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Ahnangnatoguk v. Earl Houser
as 22-70237
Petitioner:
AL ROBY AHNANGNATOGUK
Respondent:
EARL HOUSER, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
