Cases 11 - 20 of 196
MCKELVIE v. HOUSER
as 2:2023cv03733
Petitioner:
DARRELL MCKELVIE
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Houser et al
as 1:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edwards
Defendant:
Warden M. Houser, Lt. Redfern, U.M. Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAGON v. HOUSER et al
as 5:2023cv02409
Petitioner:
DAMIEN CLAGON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT MORRIS HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTY. FOR THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koehler v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections d/b/a SCI-Benner et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Curtis Koehler
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections d/b/a SCI-Benner, Morris Houser, Bradley Booher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BARNES v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2023cv02080
Petitioner:
DERRICK BARNES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUSER and SCI-BENNER TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
