Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anderson v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services et al
as 9:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael T Anderson
Defendant:
Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services and Missoula Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hastie v. Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9 et al
as 6:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Annissa Hastie
Defendant:
Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9, Montana Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Milburn v. Missoula Housing Authority et al
as 9:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christy Milburn
Defendant:
Missoula Housing Authority and United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Missoula Housing Authority v. Pfingston
as 9:2015cv00161
Defendant:
Douglas Pfingston
Plaintiff:
Missoula Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Michel et al
as 9:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lee V. Michel, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Salish & Kootenai Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Reed et al v. Ellison et al
as 6:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Reed, Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr and John Reginald Reed
Defendant:
John Ellison, Amelia Lyon, Mary Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed et al v. Ellison et al
as 9:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Reed, Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr and John Reginald Reed
Defendant:
John Ellison, Amelia Lyon, Mary Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fiechtner v. Missoula Housing Authority et al
as 9:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr and Patricia Ann Reed
Defendant:
Missoula Housing Authority, Amelia Lions, John Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
