Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Houston Holt and Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Felts, K Derrick, Shelly Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Gunner et al
as 2:2023cv02132
Plaintiff:
Judrika Houston
Defendant:
DeLay Gunner, Daniel Shone and Cindy Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Gunner et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Judrika Houston
Defendant:
DeLay Gunner, Daniel Shone and Cindy Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Morrilton, City of et al
as 4:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Deemarko Houston
Defendant:
Morrilton, City of and Morrilton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Eckles v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Houston Taylor Eckles
Defendant:
USA, Doe and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Michael W Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
