Cases 61 - 70 of 375
Britt v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Alkeem J. Britt
Defendant:
James Brazier, Teresa Coles, Caleb Creech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Alkeem J. Britt
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty, James Brazier, Thomas Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millette v. Valenza (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Dominic Anthony Millette
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriffs Department and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Houston County Sheriff's Office and James Brazier
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Hudson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
McWaters et al v. Houston et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Adam Bruner, April Bruner Webster, Randall Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff McWaters, Chris McWaters and Daisy McWaters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. BBVA USA Bancshares Inc et al
as 2:2020cv02076
Defendant:
Javier Hernandez, Jim Heslop, Shane Clanton and others
Plaintiff:
Christine D Drake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McClendon v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00819
Defendant:
Houston County Jail and Sgt. Watson
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jermaine McClendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald v. Adkins (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Jason Adkins, Houston County Jail and Alabama Police Department
Plaintiff:
Deshone Elequail Donald and Deshone Elesquail Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
