Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Collins v. Tokio Marine HCC et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Collins
Defendant:
Tokio Marine HCC, HCC Casualty Insurance Services, Inc., Houston Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wess v. Houston et al
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wess
Defendant:
R. Houston, Major Henderson, T. Wolfe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Ezell et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Steven Latrel Houston, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Ezell and Jackson County ADC
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Reyes
as 3:2021cv00539
Defendant:
Gaylynn Reyes, Jaclyn Reyes, Jaclyn Houston and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF R.A.H, A MINOR
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Amis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Young v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Evone Houston Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Trehern et al
as 1:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Thomas Beau Allison, John Houston West and Hunter Trehern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAlister v. City of Meridian, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00054
Defendant:
City of Meridian, Mississippi, Weston Lindemann and Kimberly Houston
Plaintiff:
Richie McAlister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murshid v. Keys et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Cooper, Unknown Keys, Unknown Woodall and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulkhaliq M. Murshid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston-Thomas v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Victoria Shante Houston-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Houston v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Fictitious Defendants "A," "B," and "C"
Plaintiff:
Pamela Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
