Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Flynn v. Huibregtse et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Darryl Allen Flynn
Defendant:
Charles Huibregtse, Nathan Tapio, Mary Gorske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Jess et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Peter Huibregtse, Timothy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Titus Henderson v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 21-1585
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY JESS, LORIE IVERSON, VICKI SEBASTAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Henderson, Titus v. Jess, Cathy et al
as 3:2018cv00680
Defendant:
Warden Peter Huibregtse, T. Overbo, Cathy A. Jess and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. Walls et al
as 2:2018cv01095
Defendant:
L J Schwondt, Lebeus Brown, Torrie Van Buren and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson and Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2017cv05054
Plaintiff:
Frank Rucker, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington, County of Kitsap, City of Port Orchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvernest Kennedy v. Charles Huibregtse, et al
as 15-3743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVERNEST KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. HUIBREGTSE, Doctor and KENNETH ADLER, Doctor
Rodriguez v. Meisner et al
as 2:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
Sandro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Meisner and Charles Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monge v. Doehling et al
as 2:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Manuel A Monge
Defendant:
Lori Doehling , Charlie Huibregtse, Robert Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
