Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. CCS Rose et al
as 4:2023cv05054
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
CCS Rose and Remaining Defendants Illegible
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Coyote Ridge Superintendent et al
as 4:2023cv05052
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Superintendent, Danunnle Ambruster, Larline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gabor et al v. Mariam Carter Deshler et.al.
as 2:2018cv00312
Defendant:
Estate of Miriam Carter Deshler, Miriam Carter Deshler, Rebecca Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kay Gabor and John Gabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Humphreys et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Catherine L Miller
Defendant:
Lauren Davidson Humphreys and RCO Legal PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Humphreys et al
as 2:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Kevin Miller
Defendant:
Lauren Davidson Humphreys and RCO Legal PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Humphrey v. Obenland
as 2:2013cv00244
Petitioner:
Lyle Ferdinand Humphrey
Respondent:
M Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kessack v. Walla Walla County et al
as 2:2013cv05062
Plaintiff:
Erik Kessack
Defendant:
Walla Walla County, J Michael Humphreys, James Romine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacios v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv05111
Plaintiff:
Stephen Humphrey Pacios
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Humphrey v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Phillip Garrett Humphrey
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
