Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01718
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Patton v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Patton
Defendant:
Officer Robert Sims, Timothy Humphries and Gadsden, Alabama, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin et al v. Reeves et al
as 2:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Winford Baldwin, Jr. and Vakela Humphries
Defendant:
Thomas Reeves and PAM Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphries v. Church et al
as 6:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Joe Church and Walker Rehabilitation Center
Plaintiff:
Donald Humphries
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Robinson v. Baggett et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00965
Plaintiff:
Fredrico L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angie Baggett and Melanie Humphrys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ellington et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00911
Plaintiff:
Devoris Williams
Defendant:
Edward Ellington, Larry Philyaw and Melanie Humphrys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphries et al v. Outdoorlink Services Inc.
as 7:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jack Humphries and Darrin Locke
Defendant:
Outdoorlink Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
