Cases 1 - 10 of 17
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azar El v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El
Respondent:
Jaxson Hale and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hussein v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Hussein
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOLBERT v. HUSSEIN et al
as 1:2019cv01027
Defendant:
DR. URE NE, DR. JOHN DOE 1, DR. HUSSEIN and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE M. TOLBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foy v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Foy
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eagles Nest Outfitters, Inc. v. Hussein
as 1:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Eagles Nest Outfitters, Inc.
Defendant:
Ibraheem Hussein
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Harper v. Obama et al
as 5:2016cv00717
Plaintiff:
Montorey Danyell Harper
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Loretta Lynch, DOJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
