Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Hypes v. Shifflet et al
as 1:2026cv00570
Defendant:
Josh Carpenter, Brady Thomas and Zach Shifflet
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Hypes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hypes v. Grace et al
as 1:2026cv00569
Defendant:
Natalie Shifflet, Josh Carpenter, Zach Shifflet and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Hypes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zambrano v. Hype Managed Amenities, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv09592
Defendant:
William Holt and Hype Managed Amenities, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robin Zambrano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hypes v. Shifflet et al
as 1:2026cv00545
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Hypes and Devon Hypes
Defendant:
Natalie Shifflet, Zach Shifflet and Josh Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hypes v. Rose et al
as 1:2026cv00517
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Hypes and Devon Hypes
Defendant:
Rose, Miller, Kourtney Carper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hypes v. Shifflet et al
as 1:2026cv00513
Plaintiff:
Devon J. Hypes and Devon Hypes
Defendant:
Zach Shifflet, Josh Carpenter and Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Amilcar (Dave Augustin)
as 26-2804
Defendant:
MARTIAL H. AMILCAR, MARTIAL MICHEL, MARTIAL C. AMILCAR and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hypes v. Shifflet et al
as 1:2026cv00436
Plaintiff:
Devon Hypes
Defendant:
Lt. Shifflet, Sgt. Rutkowski and Capt. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hypes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kayla N. Hypes
Interested Party:
Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
