Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02623
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01933
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20143
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv19307
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv15063
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GEMCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. I.C.E. TRANSPORT CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv08634
Plaintiff: GEMCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: I.C.E. TRANSPORT CO., INC. and ST. JOHN LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2015cv04046
Plaintiff: FELIX GUZMAN RIVADENEIRA
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Dept. of Homeland Security I.C.E.
as 3:2011cv05793
Petitioner: Oneil Garfield James
Respondent: Dept. of Homeland Security I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAOYE v. D.H.S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01969
Plaintiff: AKINTOYE LAOYE
Defendant: D.H.S., I.C.E., OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYEN v. WARDEN KIRBY et al
as 1:2010cv04525
Petitioner: PHUONG THANH NGUYEN
Respondent: WARDEN KIRBY and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?