Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
I.M. et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv11174
Plaintiff:
Brianna Palomino, Edward Tapia, Cheryl Tapia-Rufener and others
Defendant:
State Of California, California Highway Patrol, Doe CHP Officers and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
E.W. and L.W.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Officer Diego Romero, Officer Justin Silva, Officer Dusty Osmanson and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
R.N. Arbi Baghalian and Vital Medical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vintage Jewelry LLC v. Jacob Jake Chait et al
as 2:2019cv10782
Defendant:
I.M. Chait Gallery Auctioneers Inc., Heritage Auctions Inc, Jacob Chait and others
Plaintiff:
Vintage Jewelry LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
HSM Holdings, LLC v. Mantu I.M. Mobile LTD. et al
as 4:2019cv04391
Defendant:
Beezz Communications Solutions LTD, Eran Hamo, Eran Ben Eliezer and others
Plaintiff:
HSM Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez et al v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Tanti Martinez , M.M. , T.M. and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Harold Orr, Tehmina Kanwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00719
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
GSK Trade LLC et al v. I.M. Wilson Inc et al
as 8:2014cv01644
Defendant:
Does and I.M. Wilson Inc
Plaintiff:
GSK Trade LLC and Obchtchestvo s Ogranitchennoy Otvetstvennostyou Grichko
Astrum I.M., LLC v. John Hartman et al
as 2:2014cv07308
Plaintiff:
Astrum I.M., LLC
Defendant:
Does, John Hartman and Republic Capital Partners, LLC
Nailing v. Fosterer et al
as 2:2009cv02475
Plaintiff:
Xavier Dmetri Nailing
Defendant:
B.D. Fosterer, K.D. Holman, P. Coughin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
