Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Service Employees International Inc et al v. IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00604
Petitioner:
Service Employees International Inc, Service Employees International Inc, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Respondent:
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc., ACE American Insurance Company, Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. et al v. Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. and READINESS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT, L.C.
Defendant:
Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. and Johnson Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.
as 5:2008cv00364
Plaintiff:
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES INC v. JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
as 5:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hopper et al v. IAP Worldwide Services Inc
as 3:2008cv05715
Plaintiff:
Craig S Hopper and Craig S Hopper
Defendant:
The Department of the United States Navy and IAP Worldwide Services Inc
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nichols v. IAP Worldwide Services Inc
as 9:2008cv00728
Plaintiff:
Kathy Nichols
Defendant:
IAP Worldwide Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pope vs. IAP Worldwide Services Inc f/k/a International American Products Inc
as 3:2007cv01605
Plaintiff:
Ralph Pope and Ralph Pope
Defendant:
IAP Worldwide Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
