Cases 11 - 20 of 20
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Buildig Trades Welfare Plan et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00931
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Buildig Trades Welfare Plan , IBEW-NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan and MC-UA Local 119 Health and Welfare Plan
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05704
Plaintiff:
IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN
Defendant:
WYETH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff:
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff:
AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master:
STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv03301
Plaintiff:
IBEW - NECA LOCAL 505 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner:
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Respondent:
SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ARKANSAS CARPENTERS V BAYER AG
as 08-1097
Plaintiff-Appellant:
A.F. of L. -A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, AFL-CIO/CLC, Adele Brody and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, Aaron Edlin, Amy Landers and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2004cv05898
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, MC - UA LOCAL 119 HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Petitioner:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
