Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00055
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bethany v. U.S. DHS/ICE/HSI et al
as 3:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Jere T. Miles, Malcolmn "Chris" McMillin, Samuel L. Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bethany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00135
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Attorney General W. B. Barr, U.S. ICE Field Officer Director, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Inderjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ali v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00071
Respondent:
Oakdale Field Operations Director, ICE Office of Detention and Removal Office, William P. Barr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Ahmed Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pasha v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00067
Interested Party:
Pto Se
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Secretary of DHS, ICE Office of Detention and Removal Office and others
Plaintiff:
Abu Bakar Muhamed Pasha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Litt v. Reddy Ice Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Vondra Litt
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Corporation and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
