Cases 1 - 10 of 686
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Himmons v. Arizona Houses LLC
as 2:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Vander Terence Himmons, II
Defendant:
Arizona Houses LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Rosa Inchausti, Andrew Ching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joseph R Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
