Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
A 1 Immigration Services Inc v. A1 Same Day Passport & Visa Services NYC Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
A 1 Immigration Services Inc doing business as A1 Passport & Visa Services
Defendant:
A1 Same Day Passport & Visa Services NYC Inc and Amin Manji
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
BARRIENTOS DE INTERIANO et al v. ALVAREZ et al
as 2:2015cv04179
Plaintiff:
VERONICA MARLENE BARRIENTOS DE INTERIANO and EDWIN AROLDO INTERIANO CRUZ
Defendant:
FRANCISCO ALVAREZ , IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC. , EPHRAIM TAHIR MELLA and others
Cross_claimant:
LAW OFFICES OF ELAINE CHEUNG, LLC , ELAINE YI MING CHEUNG , FRANCISCO ALVAREZ and others
Cross_defendant:
FRANCISCO ALVAREZ , IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC. , LAW OFFICES OF TAHIR MELLA, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cicero Chamber of Commerce and Industry et al v. Jorge Monte De Oca et al
as 1:2012cv01404
Plaintiff:
Cicero Chamber of Commerce and Industry , Costa Azul #2, Inc. , Mr. Luigi's Ravioli Inc. and others
Defendant:
Jorge Montes De Oca and Ana Maria Montes De Oca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Onyango v. Centiv Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07729
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Onyango
Defendant:
Centiv Services, Inc., ADP TotalSource, Inc., ADP TotalSource, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Confluence International, Inc. v. U.S. Citizenship etc.
as 08-1822
Petitioner:
Confluence International, Inc.
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
