Cases 1 - 10 of 58
SISK v. IMPD et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Defendant:
IMPD, INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL AUTHORITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. IMPD et al
as 1:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
EDWIN N. HOLMES
Defendant:
IMPD, MARION COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN NAME OF THE SERGEANT ON THE SCENE AND THEIR SUPERVISORS, MARION CO. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
NESBIT v. IMPD et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
ANDRE NESBIT
Defendant:
IMPD, SPEEDWAY and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
FAGNIDE v. IMPD
as 1:2022cv01879
Plaintiff:
JEAN DE DIEU FAGNIDE
Defendant:
IMPD/POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAGNIDE v. IMPD et al
as 1:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
JEAN DE DIEU A.S. FAGNIDE
Defendant:
IMPD and VALERO GAS-STATION RETAIL STORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS v. IMPD
as 1:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PLYANDER WOODS
Defendant:
IMPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAGNIDE v. IMPD/DETAINEE PROPERTY ROOM
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
JEAN DE DIEU A. S. FAGNIDE
Defendant:
IMPD/DETAINEE PROPERTY ROOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DIEU A.S. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01581
Plaintiff:
FAGNIDE JEAN DE DIEU A.S.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IMPD and ESKENAZI HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
