Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOHERTY v. INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
JEWEL LEE DOHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC. and AFFINITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EVANKO v. INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
TISHA L. EVANKO
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Indiana County, Pennsylvania v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06072
Plaintiff:
Indiana County, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2022cv01380
Plaintiff:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45249
Plaintiff:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EQUITRANS, L.P. v. AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00570
Plaintiff:
EQUITRANS, L.P.
Defendant:
AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPLELINE ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ARMSTRONG AND INDIANA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA, ERNEST ANDERSON, EDWARD DUNMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
