Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Knight v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 24-1281
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ERNEST FABRIZIO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JOSHUA KNIGHT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
THE IBM PERSONAL PENSION PLAN, THE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR COMMITTEE and INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
IBM v. Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc.
as 24-1693
Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. IBM
as 24-1648
Appellant:
EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. IBM
as 24-1459
Appellant:
EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Wang v. International Business Machines Corp.
as 24-243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIAN WANG and James Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Adomavicius v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 5:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jurgis Adomavicius
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
David McNeil v. IBM
as 23-7162
Petitioner / Appellant:
David McNeil
Respondent / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Zillow Group, Inc. v. IBM
as 24-1274
Appellant:
ZILLOW GROUP, INC. and ZILLOW, INC.
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Ebates Performance Marketing, Inc. v. IBM
as 24-1238
Appellant:
EBATES PERFORMANCE MARKETING, INC., dba Rakuten Rewards
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
