Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Joseph Di Biase v. SPX Corporation
as 17-405
Petitioner: JOSEPH DI BIASE, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, JOHN PRODORUTTI, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, DAVID BRASS, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons and others
Respondent: SPX CORPORATION
Odunkesenler v. Continental Structural Plastics, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00092
Plaintiff: Aaron Odunkesenler
Defendant: Continental Structural Plastics, Inc. and Local 1803, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Migliori v. Honeywell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01136
Plaintiff: Joseph Migliori
Defendant: Honeywell , Local 533, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Barnes Group, Inc v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00559
Plaintiff: Barnes Group, Inc
Defendant: International Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America , Frank Acampora , Patrick Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Automobile, Aerospace, et al v. Hardin County, Kentucky, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5246
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, Local 3047, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC, INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: HARDIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, HARRY L. BERRY, Judge/Executive, JOHN WARD, Sheriff and others
Joseph Di Biase v. SPX Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH DI BIASE, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, JOHN PRODORUTTI, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons, DAVID BRASS, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant - Appellee: SPX CORPORATION
Douglass v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) et al (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff: Michael John Douglass
Defendant: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW , UAW Local 2314 and Carlex Glass Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Meyers et al v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02361
Plaintiff: Alan J. Meyers , Rocco H. Colanero , Allen Penley and others
Defendant: Daimler Trucks North America, LLC and Daimler Trucks North America Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Burton et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW et al
as 1:2014cv00076
Plaintiff: Michael Burton , Michael Jarvis and David Reed
Defendant: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW , Volkswagen Group of America, Inc and Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Amicus Curiae: BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant: TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?