Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Padilla v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
Department of Justice, 2nd Cir. CT of Appeals, 40 Foley Square and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. 203rd District Courts et al
as 3:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
203rd District Courts, Mayor of Dallas County, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. 203rd District Courts et al
as 2:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
203rd District Courts, Mayor of Dallas County, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. State of TX
as 22-11042
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Padilla v. City, Twn, or Muni of Dallas
as 22-11031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant / Appellee:
City, Town or Municipality of Dallas County, Dallas, Texas
Padilla v. The State of Texas
as 3:2022cv01695
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01579
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. CityTown or Municipality of Dallas County et al
as 3:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
CityTown or Municipality of Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
